Just exactly how it is ... e-business rules !!
This SEO Blog focuses on Web analytics and search engine optimization . The highlights will be fresh articles, videos, recent journals & conferences to news in various areas of e-business & internet marketing.
SEO Updates About Me SEO RSS Feed View All Post

Loading...

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

Google has decided to kill off more products

Google develops many products, not all of which are hits with the public

Google has announced that it is dropping seven more products in an effort to simplify its range of services.



The out-of-season “spring clean” brings an end to services including Google Wave, Knoll and Google Gears.

It is the third time that the US firm has announced a cull of several of its products at the same time after they had failed to take off.

Experts said the strategy might put off users from signing up to new services.

Google announced the move in its official blog.

“We’re in the process of shutting a number of products which haven’t had the impact we’d hoped for, integrating others as features into our broader product efforts, and ending several which have shown us a different path forward,” said Urs Holzle, Google’s vice president of operations.

“Overall, our aim is to build a simpler, more intuitive, truly beautiful Google user experience,” he added.

Wave goodbye

The seven latest products earmarked for the chop are as follows:

Google Wave – an attempt to combine email and instant messaging for real-time collaboration
Google Bookmarks List - a service which allowed users to share bookmarks with friends
Google Friends Connect – allowed webmasters to add social features to their sites by embedding a snippet of code
Google Gears – much-hyped effort to maintain web browser functionality when working offline
Google Search Timeline – a graph of historical query results
Knol – a Wikipedia-style project, which aimed to improve web content
Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal – a project which aimed to find ways to improve solar power
Google had previously announced its plans to kill off some of the projects on the list.

It has now given details about when the switch-offs will occur. For example Wave will be retired in April, and Knol content will be taken offline in October.

Lessons

The diverse nature of the list illustrated how Google operated as a company, said Richard Edwards, principal analyst at research firm Ovum.

“Any company with the resources and number of brains that Google has will have ideas, only some of which will fly. Hitting the zeitgeist is tricky to plan or predict,” he said.

The steady stream of innovations from the search giant and the open way it announced them had been a welcome change in a tech industry that had traditionally kept its cards close, said Mr Edwards.

But he warned that Google needed to be careful about how it announced new products in future.

“It can hype the bejesus out of new announcements and it can be difficult for people to pick out the substance from the hype,” he said.

There were, he said, “lessons to be learned” from firms such as Apple which took a more measured approach, announcing just a handful of new products once or twice a year.

Focus

Some experts think that Google is streamlining in order to concentrate on its Facebook rival Google+.

The network gained 10 million users within the first 16 days after its private launch, and 40 million within the first 100 days, making it the fastest-growing social network in the history of the web.

But Mr Edwards was sceptical about how successful the service would be in the long-term.

“There is no likelihood of people flocking away from Facebook at the current time unless it commits some hideous faux pas on privacy,” he said.

“Something may displace Facebook but I’m not sure it is likely to be Google+,” he added.

Read more : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15853323

Saturday, 12 November 2011

Microsoft's Search Efforts Look Increasingly Futile As Google Gains Share

It looks like the Micro-hoo partnership is not working, as the search share of Microsoft’s Bing and Yahoo has declined in October 2011 according to report by ComScore.


Google Sites accounted for 66.2 percent of total core search queries conducted (up 0.8 percentage points), followed by Yahoo! Sites with 16.3 percent and Microsoft Sites with 13.6 percent (up 0.2 percentage points). Ask Network comprised 2.6 percent of total search queries, followed by AOL, Inc. with 1.4 percent.

Microsoft spent more than $5 billion on its online business in the last year and lost $2.5billion.

Do you think Microsoft is going crazy after search for nothing?

Friday, 30 September 2011

Product URLs – a Duplicate Content Minefield

Over the past few months I have been conducting lots of SEO Audits for a vast range of clients of all sizes. One thing that always seems to come out of the audit as a significant action is to look at the URL structure and duplicate content, with a special note for the product URL.

I find it extremely frustrating that with today’s technology and the skill set of most developers, CMS Platforms still generate multiple URLs for products associated with several categories. This instantly generates duplicate content for a single product, and if this is replicated across hundreds if not thousands of products, a serious duplicate content issue occurs.

To give you an example of what happens with some CMS Platforms (all CMS platforms are different), I have described a scenario below that is from the point of view of both a merchandiser and platform.

Merchandiser: a leading retailer has a new product that needs adding to the CMS.

CMS Platform: generate a generic URL that incorporates the product title and the SKU:

www.domain.com/product/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232

Merchandiser: the product that was added is a waterproof jacket; this fits into three categories, which were selected from the options available.

CMS Platform: generate three new URLs, BUT they are SEO friendly with keywords included.

www.domain.com/category/sub-category-1/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232

www.domain.com/category/sub-category-2/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232

www.domain.com/category/sub-category-3/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232

Merchandiser: the product is added to the correct brand

CMS Platform: another URL is created for the brand product.

www.domain.com/brand/product-title-plus-sku-011232

THREE MONTHS LATER: the winter season comes to an end, so the close of season sale is on.

Merchandiser: the product didn’t sell very well and was added to the sale.

CMS Platform: a new URL is created for the product that is now associated with the sale category.

www.domain.com/sale/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232



The scenario above describes adding the product to three different core categories, a brand and sale category, resulting in the creation of five different URLs to go with the generic product URL.

Now what is the issue with that, when they are keyword rich?

One of the biggest, if not THE biggest issue with e-commerce sites is the amount of duplicate content that is created, the majority by products and product listings. The above shows a perfect example of how duplicates are being created by multiple product URLs through CMS Platforms.

So how do you solve this issue? There are a couple of ways, depending on how far you are along with the CMS and how co-operative your web development team are.

1. When adding a product to the CMS, make sure that the platform creates just ONE generic URL (www.domain.com/product/product-title-plus-sku-number-011232 ) that can then be associated with multiple categories, brands, sale page etc. This will allow the merchandiser to select multiple categories to associate the product with, which will link through to the same URL. By ensuring the use of just one URL, the amount of duplicate content would be significantly decreased.

There are numerous large brands that are already using this method to good effect, although in slightly different ways, including:

John Lewis
http://www.johnlewis.com/27573/Style.aspx
http://www.johnlewis.com/173405/Style.aspx

Amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0470554185
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-KDL32BX300-32-inch-Widescreen-Freeview/dp/B004AHKUJA/

2. If your web development team are unable to change the way the URLs are generated, speak to them about automatically creating a rel=”canonical” tag for each product with the generic URL added. This will provide the search engine with the generic URL to index instead of the other multiple URLs

3. If you are unable to implement either of the above recommendations, then I would suggest 301 redirecting the multiple URLs to the original generic URL. Before going ahead with this option, I would strongly urge you to try everything you can to get your web development team to implement either of the first two options. Option 3 will take up a considerable amount of time, with collating the different URLs for each product and then 301 redirecting them.